Appearance
Security & Compliance
Zero-Trust Deterministic Execution Architecture
Forge Pool is designed for environments where confidentiality, integrity, and auditability are mandatory.
Security is embedded into execution design — not layered on afterward.
This document describes the structural security model and compliance alignment approach.
Security Architecture Overview
Forge Pool enforces a zero-trust distributed execution model.
Core principles:
- Explicit identity at every boundary
- No implicit trust between Agents
- Isolation of execution contexts
- Deterministic verification mechanisms
- Minimal permission design
- Cryptographic integrity signals
Security controls are architectural — not policy-only.
Threat Model
Forge Pool assumes:
- Agents operate on untrusted hardware
- Network environments may be hostile
- Individual execution nodes may fail or behave maliciously
- Data leakage risk must be minimized
- Regulatory audit may require replay and traceability
Mitigation mechanisms include:
- shard-level isolation
- optional shard duplication and verification
- cryptographic identity enforcement
- deterministic replay guarantees
- transport-layer encryption
Trust is replaced with verification.
Zero-Trust Execution Model
Agents operate as isolated execution workers.
Agents do not have access to:
- customer identity data
- billing systems
- unrelated workloads
- global system state
- other agents
Isolation boundaries exist at:
- organization level
- project level
- job level
- shard level
- adapter level
Execution contexts cannot observe or influence one another.
Transport & Cryptographic Security
All communication within Forge Pool uses:
- TLS 1.3 with forward secrecy
- QUIC encrypted transport
- Mutual authentication between Hub and Agents
- Short-lived, scope-limited signed tokens
- Public key validation and pinning
Agent identity is cryptographically established.
Execution metadata can be cryptographically validated when required.
Execution Sandboxing
Each shard executes within a constrained runtime environment.
Controls may include:
- Linux namespaces and cgroups
- Restricted filesystem scope
- Ephemeral execution directories
- Process and syscall limitations
- No direct access to host environment
Shard execution is stateless.
Temporary execution artifacts are destroyed after completion.
No cross-job data persistence occurs at the Agent layer.
Data Scope & Retention
Forge Pool enforces data minimization by design.
- Execution inputs are scoped to the job
- Shards receive only necessary parameters
- Raw execution inputs are not persistently stored by default
- Artifacts retain metadata and result outputs only
Data residency can be controlled via:
- region-bound Hub deployments
- private or hybrid deployment models
- routing policies
Retention policies are configurable based on deployment model.
Enterprises retain control over data governance decisions.
Identity & Key Management
- Hub maintains secure key management practices
- Agents operate with unique cryptographic identities
- Credentials are revocable and rotatable
- Tokens are scope-limited and time-bound
- No shared secrets across organizations
Identity boundaries are explicit and enforceable.
Auditability & Traceability
Each workload produces structured artifacts including:
- job identifiers
- shard identifiers
- agent participation metadata
- execution timestamps
- verification outcomes
- ledger entries
Artifacts support:
- forensic replay
- compliance review
- audit traceability
- governance reporting
Replay does not depend on platform trust — it depends on deterministic contract enforcement.
Compliance Alignment
Forge Pool architecture supports deployments aligned with regulatory frameworks such as:
- GDPR
- SOC 2 (deployment-dependent)
- ISO 27001-aligned controls
- HIPAA-compatible deployments (private Hub required)
- PCI-aligned adapter usage (deployment dependent)
Compliance posture depends on:
- deployment configuration
- data handling policies
- enterprise governance controls
- selected adapters
Forge Pool does not claim blanket certification across all deployment models.
Deployment Models & Security Posture
Supported enterprise deployment models:
- Managed SaaS
- Hybrid (enterprise nodes + public mesh)
- Private Hub (VPC or on-prem)
- Region-bound execution
- Air-gapped deployment (local Hub + local Agents)
Security guarantees remain structurally consistent across models, while operational control increases with isolation.
Shared Responsibility Model
Forge Pool secures:
- execution infrastructure
- workload isolation
- deterministic verification
- cryptographic identity
- artifact integrity
Enterprises retain responsibility for:
- data classification
- regulatory interpretation
- internal governance
- user access management
- business decision-making
Security is collaborative, not delegated.
Summary
Forge Pool replaces implicit trust in distributed compute with:
- deterministic verification
- cryptographic identity
- workload isolation
- replayable artifacts
- governance-ready metadata
Security is structural.
Verification replaces assumption.
→ Related: